01 Oct

Police shootings, pipelines, water, ride-sharing, dropouts…

If you don’t believe local government – from school and water districts to county and city councils, boards and commissions are important to engage with – you’re missing the big picture.

Government starts in our communities yet, oftentimes citizens and civic-stakeholders are either bewildered about the process, don’t have the time and energy to act and advocate, don’t have the money or resources and don’t realize there are many like-minded people who may want to join in and help create change.

We see issue after issue arising in our communities and most people feel they do not make a difference and allow themselves to be governed. We propose government should be collaborative, on a much wider scale. Without that issues like these will continue to roll over communities until it’s politically necessary for government to change:

  • leaded-pipe water crisis in Flint, Michigan
  • hundreds of men of color being shot and killed by police
  • tens of thousands of poor and minority being incarcerated, and re-incarcerated
  • school systems where families are not receiving equal education
  • the Dakota Access Pipeline project
  • water scarcity issues and corporate America’s interest to profit
  • the never-ending flow of drunk drivers swerving through our communities
  • an onslaught of home, auto, transportation sharing-services
  • publicly guaranteed projects like stadiums and arenas
  • asset forfeiture laws, practices and oversight
  • homelessness, and the lack of resources to sufficiently shelter our residents

These are all things that all cities and civic-stakeholders are wrangling with, exacerbated by a shifting economy, polarizing political climate, a high-level corporate consolidation pattern and a increasingly fragmented traditional and online media roles.

In most all of these situations, local governments are dealing with these issues independently – resulting in redundant or completely different laws from city to city, administrative and enforcement challenges and a bonanza for attorneys, courts and the political service industry.

Municipal codes, policies, annual goals, funding considerations, outcome metrics, strategic plans, day to day operational issues are all items local elected leaders juggle to satisfy our educational, public safety, health and welfare – and above all, financial stability – needs. Yet, the people most affected by these decisions are rarely included in the conversations.

Our goal is to help organize records to get them in the hands of people, businesses, advocacy organizations, other governments – any civic stakeholder interested in improving our government. How will we answer this call? Should we wait for government itself to organize, create transparency policies and begin normalizing code, laws, policies and practices? Or, should we begin at the source, our local government meeting rooms?

23 Sep

Sunlight Foundation is shifting gears…

After writing the Sunlight Foundation to learn if they were going to expand Scout into local markets, Eric Mill responded with an email that began with ‘I love getting letters like these’. I love getting responses like that, and that little spark evolved into a five-year odyssey – which truthfully has been both frustrating yet intoxicating.

The Black Lives Matter movement, Dakota-area Anti-#DAPL protest, prisoner strikes, leaded-water quality issues, and the extremely complex personal relationships and major-policy positions of our leading political candidates, all point to the need for doubling-down on the strategic direction of the open-government and civic tech movement.

The fact is however that we are a bunch of passionate citizens, using traditional business models while expecting to influence and shift highly sophisticated, multi-trillion dollar budgeted institutions and corporations that involve highly complex relationships… oftentimes including the very sources we look to for support.

I believe we need to take a much more radical approach to civic tech that focuses on Lincoln’s vision of “Government of the People, by the People, for the People” which has been temporarily replaced by todays “Government for the Corporations, by the Attorneys and through the Politicians.”

If we expect to grow the civic tech movement with relatively faint strategic efforts and resources we are sorely mistaken. I hope we all look at this moment as a baton being handed off, not dropped. Given the position the US has globally, if we’re true to our mission of improved civic engagement and accountability, we could literally affect every person on this planet. We can do so much better.

02 Jun

Evolving Government Policy and Internet Trends

The venture capitalist Mary Meeker presented an extensive Internet Trends analysis at the recent 2015 Re-Code conference.

It’s an extensive 194-slide report. Important to our mission is one of her nine ‘high level summary’ items includes:

Need to Shape Direction & Evolve Policies & Laws
Industry participants (workers / businesses / governments) need to work together to be more aligned with rapidly emerging ways of doing business & creating work & recognize that emerging technologies / marketplaces can help solve for consumer & worker welfare.

Mary Meeker
Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB)

Also notable item is the analysis that government is only starting to dip it’s toe into realizing Internet impacts and illustrated here:


24 Apr

America’s CivicArchive

20150412_185543_Richtone(HDR)Until a couple weeks ago, my fears of encouraging too-early competition held me back from developing the core of today’s CivicArchive project on an open basis.

That changes now.

While attending a special event in New York City’s CivicHall last week, I had a chance to meet many of the civic champions I admire. Just a few days earlier I met one early champion in Carl Malamud at a GOVLAB Lunch with Leaders event. It took talking with Carl a few minutes to give me the important friendly nudge I needed (thanks Carl :)… which leads me to this post.

I was recently asked to break the CivicArchive project down to a one-pager. I updated that letter and also left out how much funding we’re seeking since there are many to-be-determined variables to consider. Suffice to say if we can raise an appropriate amount we will do a fierce job expanding CivicArchive nationally. That will also give us the ability to collaborate and develop some significantly useful open-based and commercial-based products and services. Top on my list is approaching CivicArchive from a sustainability-focused business perspective, and one that is on a social mission… in that order. More on that later. Here’s our story:

process-mapWe’re on a mission and seeking partners to build America’s first open local-government library of governance, financial, administrative and other key records.

The CivicArchive will include a diverse aggregation of records such as legislative, committee and commission agendas, minutes and related documents and audio/video captions. We’ll also have profiles of elected officials, key staff, and external agencies as well as calendars, organizational charts, policies and processes.

We are cognizant of the many challenges inherent in such a project. Although most records are usable, many are difficult to interpret programmatically due to myriad document structures and types and various technology challenges. The good news is that contemporary indexing and machine-learning technologies powering search allow large collections of disparate records to be made highly usable.

Our solution is timely, financially sustainable and socially focused. We’ll build on a ‘collect it all’ (sic) strategy by harvesting key records, storing them in the cloud and making them available to anyone through a search or API interface. We’ll use and build upon open-source software. Since we’re retaining the primary-source documents and records, as technologies improve, we’ll periodically re-index them to improve search results.

In 2013, with support from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, we built an agenda alerting tool our beta subscribers used to learn when local government was meeting about issues they cared about. We have spent well over two years researching, building and adjusting – and almost every potential user we interviewed told us that their problem is bigger than alerts. That is, many need services like the ability to search a collection of records autonomously or, having timely and curated content on a more widespread, national scale.

The solution we propose opens America’s local-government records collection to the entire community, while also addressing our need to build an active, commercially and socially sustainable enterprise. We’ll use our resources to give back by supporting development of several open-data projects we’ve identified. We’ll also fund programs helping civic entrepreneurs, especially those from and serving under-represented populations, to build their own sustainable businesses. Both of these initiatives will be powered by the open CivicArchive you will help build.

We’re seeking seed funding from interested investors or grantors. This funding will allow us to ideally relocate into a nexus of civic champions within a key information publishing community like the new CivicHall in New York City. By strategically networking with other civic champions, while utilizing the depth of talent and resources there, we’ll launch the CivicArchive library and begin selling our services to a list of clients who want our solutions today.

The status quo is unreasonable. By not having such a library, elected officials, municipal staff, vendors, researchers, media, advocacy organizations, citizen-advocates and every citizen miss opportunities to improve their communities. We can do better.

We intent on the importance of building what will become a pivotal element of the local American community – an open, aggregated, searchable and permanent local archive.

We hope to present a more detailed proposal and begin working together. If you are interested in collaborating, supporting or otherwise getting engaged with this important project please contact Jerry Hall at 858-344-1104 or, via email to Jerry@CivicArchive.com.

Thank you!